Development Update - Auto Categories

Jeremy avatarJeremy 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Hello brewers,"},{"attributes":{"header":3},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\nWe've implemented an optional feature that "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"automatically applies custom categories (Ramp, Draw, Removal, etc.) to cards you add to your deck"},{"insert":". These auto categories were assigned to cards based on the ones most commonly applied by our users. So thank you for providing us with the data to do this!\n\nA few notes:\nThere's only about 30 auto categories that we've chosen to allowlist. This was done to ensure you don't end up with some cards in \"Draw\" with others in \"Card Draw\". In general, you may find the categories end up being broader than you'd personally make them (\"Removal\" includes boardwipes and targeted removal, for instance), but it keeps the data much cleaner and consistent than it'd be otherwise."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Additionally, not all cards have auto categories assigned to them yet. These tend to be new and less commonly played cards and you're not likely to have too many of them in any given deck unless you're making something super spicy. As these cards get assigned to custom categories more frequently however, we'll eventually have enough data to assign them auto ones as well."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"On your Account Settings page, this is an opt-out feature, meaning new users will be using these auto categories immediately. "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"For all preexisting users however, we've toggled the opt-out on already as to not interrupt anyone's workflow"},{"insert":". If you're interested in trying it out, we'd greatly appreciate you turning it on (in this case, by toggling off the opt-out) and letting us know what you think! You can find it under "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://archidekt.com/accountSettings/sitesettings"},"insert":"Account Settings > Site Settings"},{"insert":" > Card Search Settings. (We briefly had a bug where the opt-out wasn't being applied to preexisting users. If you're noticing that's the case for you, please try refreshing the page and/or logging out and logging back in.)"},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\n"},{"insert":{"image":"https://i.imgur.com/iZvR0IF.gif"}},{"insert":"\n\nThat’s it for today! We know this won’t slot in well to everyone’s workflow, but hope it proves useful to many others. \n\nIf you have anything to suggest or report, you can find us here, "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://twitter.com/archidekt"},"insert":"@Archidekt"},{"insert":" on Twitter, or over in "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://discord.gg/eZg3mvJd7v"},"insert":"Discord"},{"insert":". As always, feedback is greatly appreciated!\n\nThe Archidekt Team"},{"attributes":{"header":3},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\n"}]}
Edited 7/24/2023, 5:41:50 PM
42
{"ops":[{"insert":"Love this feature! I noticed this happening before seeing this post and had to do a double take lol\n"}]}
5
{"ops":[{"insert":"This is cool, nice work!\nSeems to be only applying to quick add, rather than from the search panel. Am I missing something?\n\nEDIT: if you're having similar issues, try clearing your cookies for Archidekt, worked for me\n"}]}
Edited 7/25/2023, 1:11:51 AM
3
Jeremy avatarJeremy 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"It "},{"attributes":{"italic":true},"insert":"should"},{"insert":" be working anywhere you add it from. It is working from Quick Add for you though?\n"}]}
3
{"ops":[{"insert":"Radical.\n"}]}
2
Ejwins avatarEjwins 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Seems useful\n"}]}
2
Crazy_AI avatarCrazy_AI 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"This is really cool, thank you.\n"}]}
2
MegaMattEX avatarMegaMattEX 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Really enjoy this feature as a newbie! Thought it was a pre-existing feature that I somehow turned on\n"}]}
2
NinjaMonkey avatarNinjaMonkey 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"is there a way for a preexisting deck to be sorted? \nthis is amazing in every way!\n"}]}
6
{"ops":[{"insert":"Love this update and everything you and the team do for Archidekt! As always this platform continues to be the best platform for deck building and card collection. I love it and use it daily so never stop! \n\nA suggestion for a feature I mentioned months ago (might even be a year ago at this point) that I’d personally like to see is sub categories within main categories. For example I have all my Instant cards and I want to keep them under “Instant” but would also want to have them in a sub-category like “Exile” or “Card Draw”. I love the category feature and use it a lot but sometimes while making a deck I’ll organize my cards for specific categories but then will switch them back to their original categories. I do enjoy the multi-select feature as that makes it much easier to move a ton of cards to a category all at once. I’m probably in this boat alone but I personally do think it’s be a neat feature to have!\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"I've sometimes used the multi-category view to sort of get this effect; would that help?\n"}]}
3
MelffyBunilla avatarMelffyBunilla 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"I like the thing with Card Draw and Draw, but importantly, does "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Divine Intervention"}},{"insert":" and "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Celestial Convergence"}},{"insert":" go into Draw? [some smirking emoji]\n"}]}
1
Galderman avatarGalderman 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"As someone who is HORRID at deckbuilding, this is exactly what I NEED! However, How do I sort a deck by this new feature? \n"}]}
1
wade42 avatarwade42 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"When looking at your deck, at the top of the page, there's a dropdown for \"Group By\". Make sure that's set to \"Categories\", or \"Categories (Multiple)\" (I like Multiple).\n\nFor existing decks, you'll probably have to remove all your cards and re-add them? Should be easy via the Import feature. (select all, copy, delete, save changes, paste, save changes)\n"}]}
1
Mastermind avatarMastermind 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Useful feature for those who have little patience and expertise to sort themselves. Thanks for letting me opt-out of the feature. There are some cases where I like to be more specific and the automatic categories are too broad.\n"}]}
0
Scallywag749 avatarScallywag749 9 months
{"ops":[{"attributes":{"strike":true},"insert":"Heads up \"Account settings > Site settings\" link leads to 404."},{"insert":"\n"}]}
Edited 7/20/2023, 5:19:57 PM
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"It doesn't for me.\n\nWhat browser are you on? This sounds similar to a firefox bug that doesn't respect cookies on redirects for some reason. \n\nThat link should work so long as you're logged in. \n"}]}
0
Scallywag749 avatarScallywag749 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Is it possible to add this sorting to the card packages feature? Maybe make it toggle-able somehow, using this sorting and the premade card packages don't currently mesh together at all.\n"}]}
0
Jeremy avatarJeremy 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Yup, good catch. We're discussing internally a couple of different approaches, but we definitely plan to make the new auto categories work with packages in some way. Thank you for the heads up! \n"}]}
1
ampampamp avatarampampamp 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Sweet feature! Also, prefer that in the future you use the terms allowlist and blocklist. \n"}]}
0
Jeremy avatarJeremy 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Yeah, good call. Appreciate you bringing it to our attention\n"}]}
1
daem0nfaust avatardaem0nfaust 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"Ahhhh yes, a features update that couldn't have been done without user data. Congratulations on reaching that amount of users to acquire the necessary data for this. \n"}]}
1
Jeremy avatarJeremy 9 months
{"ops":[{"insert":"It honestly feels great having this be something the community built rather than us just guessing at what people would want categories to be called. \n"}]}
1