charlouminou17 7 months{"ops":[{"insert":"This is my first commander deck and Im trying to do it budget. LMK if I should change something about the deck https://archidekt.com/decks/5380346/where_are_the_woofs\n"}]}
0
John_Sherwood 7 months{"ops":[{"insert":"32 lands is a recipe for frustration and disappointment. You will have to mulligan a lot. You will miss land drops. Check out this Command Zone "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://youtu.be/Hg7nFiDNeHs?si=CK-Csu1H8eSm3tSb"},"insert":"episode"},{"insert":". Minute 8:10 if you don't want to watch the whole thing. They explain the probabilities better than I can. \n\n15 ramp sources is fine, but your land count is so low that your ramp will be playing catch up instead of accelerating your board development.\n\nI would replace Farseek with a Mountain. Farseek is great for color fixing in decks with 3 or more colors, but in a 2-color deck it's frequently worse than a basic land.\n\nI would cut these creatures: "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Afflicted Deserter // Werewolf Ransacker"}},{"insert":" "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Breakneck Rider // Neck Breaker"}},{"insert":" "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Reckless Waif // Merciless Predator"}},{"insert":" and "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Wolfkin Outcast // Wedding Crasher"}},{"insert":" because their front sides don't have abilities. Replacing these creatures with lands will make your deck more consistent.\n"}]}
0
charlouminou17 7 months{"ops":[{"insert":"I will watch that video. As of the lands, it should be fixed.\n"}]}
0